As warned in content-visibility
: the new CSS property that boosts your rendering performance you need to be careful with applying content-visibility: auto;
on each and every element as the scrollbar might get jumpy.
This is because elements will be rendered as they scroll into the viewport and will be hidden as they scroll out of the viewport, thereby affecting the height of the rendered page, and thus also affecting the scrollbar.
ℹ️ Apart from a jumpy scrollbar it can also negatively affect accessibility when you include headings and landmark elements inside of regions styled with content-visibility: auto;
. See Content-visibility and Accessible Semantics for details.
Now, thanks to infinite scroll we are — or at least I am — kind of used to the thumb part of the scrollbar shrinking and jumping back up a bit on the scrollbar track as you scroll down. What we’re not used to is the thumb part jump forwards on the scroll track as you scroll down. This is because elements that slide out of the viewport will no long be rendered — as that’s what content-visibility: auto;
does — and the scrollbar is (by default) only calculated against the rendered elements.
Elements can become non-rendered elements as they scroll out of the viewport,
thanks to content-visibility: auto;
doing its thing.
To cater for this jumpy behavior you should use contain-intrinsic-size
so space for an element is reserved when it’s not being rendered. However, it is not always possible to know a box its dimensions in advance. Looking for a way to automatically reserve space for previously rendered elements, Alex Russel created a little script for it.
One challenge with naive application of
content-visibility
, though, is the way that it removes elements from the rendered tree once they leave the viewport — particularly as you scroll downward. If the scroll position depends on elements above the currently viewable content “accordion scrollbars” can dance gleefully ascontent-visibility: auto
does its thing.
In a first version of the script he applied content-visibility: visible
on each element from the moment it had appeared on screen. To detect this an IntersectionObserver
is used. While this does prevent the scrollbar thumb from jumping forwards as you scroll down, it will make the page slow again as that content remains rendered (even though it’s off-screen).
A second version of the script takes a different approach and calculates the contain-intrinsic-size
to apply based on the element’s dimensions. That way elements that passed by once now have a correct contain-intrinsic-size
set, and can safely be hidden again as content-visibility: auto
does its job.
let spaced = new WeakMap();
let reserveSpace = (el, rect) => {
let old = spaced.get(el);
// Set intrinsic size to prevent jumping.
if (!old || rectNotEQ(old, rect)) {
spaced.set(el, rect);
el.attributeStyleMap.set(
"contain-intrinsic-size",
`${rect.width}px ${rect.height}px`
);
}
};
Additionally he also added a ResizeObserver
to cater for resize events.
Resize-Resilient `content-visiblity` Fixes →
🤔 Clever script indeed, yet I cannot help but think: this should be possible without the needs for this extra script. What if a value like contain-intrinsic-size: auto;
would be allowed, and do exactly as the script Alex built does?
UPDATE 2020.12.21: I’ve created an issue on GitHub that proposes contain-intrinsic-size: auto;
. Let’s see where this goes …
UPDATE 2021.01.13: Looks like support for contain-intrinsic-size: auto;
will land in the spec!
I am looking forward to new updates about this! Cool article! I subscribed to the GitHub issue.
My site is light enough, but I will definitely add this when the CSS class is more production ready.